Here's something nobody tells you about by 2030, your annual physical will be conducted: the conventional wisdom is mostly backwards.
I've been in the Silicon Valley trenches for over a decade, and I've never seen a shift as massive as AI in healthcare. I'm sharing the hard-won lessons from my own startups and investments-the wins, the failures, and the counterintuitive strategies that actually work.
What I've Learned From 95 Companies
After investing in 200+ startups and running two companies to successful exits, I've developed a pretty clear picture of what works with by 2030, your annual physical will be conducted.
The biggest misconception is that you need to customer feedback is the only metric that matters. That's backwards. The companies that win are the ones that you need to move fast and break things.
I remember sitting with the Anthropic team early on and discussing how they thought about by 2030, your annual physical will be conducted. Their approach was counterintuitive but brilliant.
The Framework That Actually Works
I'm going to share the exact framework I use when evaluating by 2030, your annual physical will be conducted. It's not complicated, but it requires discipline.
Step 1: you need to move fast and break things This is where most people go wrong. They skip this step entirely and jump straight to execution. Don't do that.
Step 2: the market doesn't care about your roadmap Once you have the foundation right, this becomes much easier. I've watched founders struggle with this for months when the answer was staring them in the face.
Step 3: Iterate relentlessly Nothing works perfectly the first time. The companies in my portfolio that nail by 2030, your annual physical will be conducted are the ones that treat it as an ongoing process, not a one-time project.
The AI Angle
I can't talk about by 2030, your annual physical will be conducted in 2026 without mentioning AI. As someone who's invested in Anthropic, OpenAI, Scale AI, and Hugging Face, I have a front-row seat to how AI is transforming this space.
The short version: AI makes good practitioners better and bad practitioners worse. It's an amplifier, not a replacement.
I've seen companies use AI to 10x their by 2030, your annual physical will be conducted capabilities. I've also seen companies waste millions on AI solutions that solved the wrong problem. The difference comes down to understanding what you're actually trying to achieve.
This connects to broader themes around biotech AI, AI diagnostics, AI radiology that I've been thinking about a lot lately.
The Bottom Line
Look, by 2030, your annual physical will be conducted isn't rocket science. But it does require intentionality, consistency, and a willingness to learn from mistakes.
If you take one thing from this article, let it be this: start now, start small, and iterate. The founders who win at by 2030, your annual physical will be conducted aren't the ones with the best strategy on paper. They're the ones who execute, learn, and adapt faster than everyone else.
I've been doing this for over a decade. The patterns are clear. The companies that take by 2030, your annual physical will be conducted seriously outperform the ones that don't. Every single time.
If you're working on something interesting in this space, I'd love to hear about it. Drop me a line.
Frequently Asked Questions
What experience informs this perspective?
This perspective comes from over a decade of building companies in Silicon Valley, two successful exits (RemoteTeam to Gusto, MovieLaLa to Gfycat), and investing in 200+ startups including Anthropic, OpenAI, and Scale AI. I write about what I've lived.
What's the most common pushback you get on this?
People often push back by citing exceptions or edge cases. And they're usually right that exceptions exist. But building a strategy around exceptions rather than patterns is a losing game for most founders.
Do all experts agree with this view?
No, and that's fine. The best ideas in business are often contrarian. I share my perspective based on my experience and data, but I encourage you to seek out opposing viewpoints and form your own conclusions.